Continuing on the theme of the editorial success, it is useful to define another factor often linked to it: leadership, the ability to lead.
should first be noted that not be considered in all cases in which the leadership is of "coercive" or "required" because there's a lot vaccations precisely among those who are "in charge", in command, and who is the leader, or who actually "leads" on to something personal. In a nutshell, there is opposed to run the command, as it is in sharp contrast with the role of chief to that of the leader . In many cases, then the roles are the same, and then the situation will be very strong: it is not enough to be a general respect for the military and not enough to be fathers to enjoy the esteem of the children, but sometimes the combination is possible.
Once again, the values \u200b\u200bof leadership, are not tied to the individual sphere (as I suspect many of you believe) but it is a social and collective value, because the power draws strength from the consent , not authoritarianism , although the latter is sometimes indisputably a necessary tool.
try to understand better what are the qualities that nurture the leadership: great leaders have something that when you see it, recognize you know, but it's hard to describe with precision. Certainly, the leadership has nothing to do with charisma (even if they have influenced) or with the style. E ' something to do with the authenticity and integrity above all . It 's something that has to do with the take personal risks for the public good, something that allows others to feel part of something bigger, that it is a company, a movement or a family. Leadership is the ability to develop social architecture that allows others to be understood and followed, in which a model for others to believe .
JS
0 comments:
Post a Comment