Edmonton Male Waxing Brazilian

This time I do not know what to say.

few days ago I was invited to join a social network called Affluence.org . After reading the mail of presentation I had almost convinced that it was spam or a joke, because more or less went like this (in English): You are invited to join our exclusive network of millionaires will give you access to various privileges Typically, a concierge service calls for any event on the planet, as well as allow you to be in direct contact with other States "tributaries" like you.

But the best part is this: to register you must have a household income of at least € 300.00 or a total net worth at least 3 million . Checks will be made about your status.

So I Googled the community and saw that it was a joke, it really exists, and I'm shocked. At least, however, say it clear here: you're only interested millionaire.

Miracles (and aberrations) in the network.

I will let you know.

JS

Can U Buy Valium Off The Counter?

First of all, as I feel it is time to tell you not suspect that the indistria car failed, flawed source. The sector has taken on a role too important (in terms of employment and contribution to GDP) in relation to the product that sells. The auto market is chronically cyclical, when it's bad eating the fat that produces at best. Vice to the bottom line is this: why an individual should change the car all the time? And above all, because it must do if your car continues to run well? What we have created is a huge misunderstanding, crafted, which likens the change to drive change of clothes. Fashion and status, in fact. I have a BMW for nine years, is still beautiful, well kept, and I have no need to change it, so long as it continues to do his job. She was beautiful when I bought it, and remains so today. It was paid in cash, who gave it to me could afford. No PMT, no lease, that machine is not part of the mechanism by which "at some point you may wish to change it, otherwise not worth anything." My brother has a BMW, newer than mine, and I remember distinctly that I felt when I saw it just a difference in just a few years, BMW had changed its strategy by increasing the technology and reducing the intrinsic value of the car in terms of finishes, materials and perceived luxury. He sliced \u200b\u200bopen the market wider, more models with "cheap" at that time were non plus ultra. But they were destined to grow old soon. They were, and are self "on scheduled date." From the point of view TECHNOLOGY, but especially from the aesthetic point of view. Soon that will seem old BMW. My hand, that the old lady is for real, will always have that austere and solid line with what had been conceived. Let me give you another example. You know the Mercedes SL? Well, my grandfather had one in 1972, wonderful, never a night out of the garage, perfect, immortal. That model lasted twenty years. That after only 10, and the current starts to change in less than 5. Maybe a bit mistake the years, but the concept remains. The auto manufacturers 'premium' had changed their strategy. They wanted to get into all segments of the market, wanted to sign promissory notes and lease agreements at all, and to support the play had to quickly change models: making oboleti soon forced to sign new leases and so on. Just ask your grandfather or your father, in those who owned BMW or Mercedes in their time. I'm sure you will say, "certainly less than now." I think this has much to do with the "cesca at any cost," but this is a medium much more complex and I are certainly not the best person to deal with it.

Let us yesterday. Two articles on IHT: the first "BMW puts a premium on independence", the second Fiat in talks to buy GM's European operations, " clearly discernible two opposite strategies. On the one hand Marchionne says that you can not survive with less than 6 million cars sold, the other BMW expects a return to basics, focusing on restoring the old values \u200b\u200b(luxury and quality) and independence. hard to determine who will be right, because maybe, two or three years, the car will return to "pull" and then Chrysler-Fiat-Opel-GM exploit the synergies between them and they will return to enjoy the positive cycle. Or maybe BMW will be right, which, by virtue of its independence, will be able to better withstand the next slump. One thing is certain: the larger the ship, the more money it takes to keep it afloat when it sinks. Imagine if, in the next negative cycle, we had to save (with public money) like a giant that is looming than mergers driven by Fiat. It would be a tragedy of unimaginable dimensions . Much will probably nobody would have the resources to save it from bankruptcy. I find that this is very dangerous, and it seems that this crisis has not just taught us nothing. The auto market is doped, not market basic necessities and this will always be exposed to economic cycles on a massive scale. What we want now is just another realization, one should reduce rather than exaggerate, rather than rationalize "securitization", we should build better cars that pollute less and lasting longer. A downsizing of the car industry would be painful, yes, but it would be an important step to restore everything to its natural size.

JS

Rollercoaster Tycoon Platinumno Cd

was a bit 'of time that I came Monaco, last weekend we were in a boat, guests of a beloved friend. Two nights at anchor, the first Saint-Jean Cap Ferrat , the second in Villefranche . Third and fourth night in Port Hercule , the port of Monaco. Although our owner is a xenophilous convinced, I could not fail to compare that beautiful stretch of coast with its continuation the Italian Ligurian one. What emerges is that the villages, in themselves, are much less attractive: in terms of artistic and architectural heritage there is no comparison, Portovenere, Portofino, Cinque Terre, Lerici and so away, have a different atmosphere, a more charming. The point, however, is that they are not cared for, according to the old (and unfortunately true) rumor that the French healthy sell better, even if the material available, it is modest.

Monaco, Monte Carlo, however, are another story: the greater the perception that I had is that there all be on vacation for a lifetime, no one works . Compared with other international places of holiday, such as Porto Cervo and St. Moritz, where it is clear that the tourists are on holiday "on time", between a CDA and another in Monte Carlo, looking people in the eye, you feel the next day will not be in office. MC is an island to enjoy the golden inheritance and pensions.

Some trivial observations:

-Hotels change names but not appealing: Fairmont Le Meridien and, in true American style, seem to airport terminals.

-Supercar in profusion, but all stand out Rolls-Royce, Bentley and Ferrari .

-Dispelling the myth that the police would be very strict in prosecuting emulating Schumacher: the Maserati with which we moved (driven by "professional" editor's note) has walked briskly to the F1 track, more than once, and most already set to host the next Grand Prix.

- Atlantis , historic yacht Niarchos family, and Pacha III, the Grimaldi, are two wonders, though opposed to the message they carry. The first is a true manifestation of power (105mt, was the answer to Christina Onassis), the second a gem steeped in tradition, lightness and elegance.

-Al Sass, piano bar that draws a lot Later, the bar is lined with bottles of vodka with a label on it: it is the customer's name and date of purchase, so that the delay sipossa at will.

-Regarding the "Vodka Wars", the battle was won in Monaco (and largely) from Grey Goose . The French, here, have certainly dettto law.

-The Jimmy'z is a great local, well attended and fun. Too bad for the service painful, especially if compared to what is dear.

Weekend fun, though, and definitely over the top, but here the tale can not continue.

JS